“Good is
the enemy of great.
And that is
one of the key reasons why we have so little that becomes great.
We don’t
have great schools, principally because we have good schools. We don’t have
great government, principally because we have good government. Few people
attain great lives, in large part because it is so just easy to settle for good
life. The vast majority of companies never become great, precisely because the
vast majority become quite good—and that is the main problem.”
These are
few lines from the book ‘Good to Great’ by Jim Collins. While reading this book
as the college project, I came across a mind-blowing phrase, which just totally
shooked my whole way of thinking that, “Good
is the enemy of great”. It is just too easy to settle for good, and
that’s the main reason or the problem that we have only a few great leaders,
schools, companies, personality, and government just because principally we
have attained the ‘level’ good in them all. Take it as a book review, or
summary or dissection but needed to be done.
While going through
the research phase of the book, one question which always strucked the author’s
mind was, ‘Can good company become a great company, and if so how? Or is the
disease of ‘just being good’ incurable? As he was performing the research work
on ‘good to great companies’, thus his all the questions and queries revolved
around the few set of companies.
While performing the research work, the author and his team
reached to a conclusion, which later created more confusion. They observed that
all the ‘good to great’ companies showed some similar traits irrespective of
their market capitalisation, sector in which they deal, or any other
differential basis. They called that conclusion as ‘black box’. They referred it as black box because it contained some
secret recipe, and whichever company used it as an ingredient in their growth
process, showed unexpectedly great results. Now the task was to find that
secret recipe, which helped in transformation from ‘good to great’. And after
rigorous research and sleepless nights the ‘secret’ was out:
The secret box of 'recipe'
1.
Strategy did not separate the good-to-great companies
from the comparison companies. Both set of companies had well defined
strategies, and there is no evidence that good to great companies spent more
time on long-range strategic planning than the comparison companies.
2.
The good to great companies primarily did not
focus on what to do to become great; they focussed equally on what not to do
and what to stop doing.
3.
Mergers and acquisitions play virtually no role
in igniting the transformation process; two big mediocrities joined together
never make one great company.
Along these points he also mentioned,
“We were surprised, shocked really, to discover the type of leadership required
for turning a good company into a great one. Compared to high-profile leaders
with big personalities who make headlines and become celebrities, the good-to-great
leaders seem to have come from Mars. Self-effacing, quiet, reserved, even
shy-these leaders are a paradoxical blend of personal humility and professional
will. They are more like Lincoln and Socrates than Patton or Caesar.
These were few mentioned tips by the
author for transformation from ‘good to great’. The game here is, he researched
and gave tips for good to great companies and you have to apply your own brain
cells and use these tips in your life to achieve great and not settle for good.
Great 👍
ReplyDelete